Suchergebnisse

This book examines the Hong Kong Mongkok Riot (MKR) of 2016 to offer a clear and objective account of the events as they unfolded, to dispel the myths, and to explore what can be learned from it. It draws on multiple sources including: public survey data, eyewitness accounts, LegCo proceedings, official press releases, newspaper reports, and video presentations. The study investigates the causes, issues and impacts of MKR including how the media reported it. It examines the historical context surrounding MKR, before and after, and considers the importance of this independent inquiry including its use and limitations. It aims to bring closure to the event, establish a record for the future, provide insightful data for cross-cultural studies on riots, and offer insights for police scholars, security consultants, political scientists, Asian and Chinese studies scholars, and comparative criminal justice researchers.

1. Policing in Hong Kong : the early years -- 2. Policing Hong Kong police -- 3. Controlling police use of force -- 4. Beat patrol deployment in Hong Kong -- 5. Policing computer crime in Hong Kong -- 6. Assessing police investigative powers : the case of interception of communications surveillance ordinance -- 7. One country, two systems of policing : People's Republic of China Gong An vs. Hong Kong police reform.

With nearly 20 percent of the world's population located in China, what happens there is significant to all nations. Sweeping changes have altered the cultural landscape of China, and as opportunities for wealth have grown in recent years, so have opportunities for crime. Police Reform in China provides a rare and insightful glimpse of policing in the midst of such change. The book begins with a historical account of police reform in the region since 2000. Next, it discusses the difficulties encountered in trying to understand Chinese policing, such as outdated perceptions, misinformation, cul.

Legislative process -- Legislative climate -- Implementation of USAPA -- Impact on the Muslim community -- Impact on liberty -- Grassroots resistance -- A preliminary assessment

On 1 July 1997, Hong Kong, a colony (euphemistically called dependent territory) of Britain, was returned to the fold of the motherland, China, as a Special Administration Region, with a high degree of autonomy. Ten years on, we find that the common law system established by the British in Hong Kong, as guaranteed by the Basic Law, survived and thrived. A cursory review of legal and social science literature shows that there is little scholarly discourse or public debate on the proper jurisprudence standards to be applied in the making and evaluation of Hong Kong legislation. This research raises a most fundamental policy qua jurisprudence issue: Should Hong Kong law be formulated, applied or evaluated with indigenous legal standards and local jurisprudence principles, based on Asian values, Chinese culture and/or Hong Kong ethos? In so doing, this article questions the appropriateness and challenges the legitimacy of adopting Western jurisprudence principles in shaping and evaluating the Hong Kong legal system, especially after 1 July 1997.

As a scholarly discipline, criminology in China is growing in stature, maturity and utility. In the short thirty years since 1979, China has successfully established criminology as a scientific field of study with well-defined subjects, recognised scholars and copious research/publications. To date, there are very few systematic and comprehensive studies of criminology (in English language) as an emerging and important field of academic discipline in China. As a result, we know very little about its focus and scope; direction and trend; theories and findings; and problems and issues. This is a first attempt to do so. The article (in two parts, published separately) investigates into: 'Literature on law, crime and punishment in China', 'The idea of crime (Fanzui)', 'Traditional thinking of crime and punishment in imperial China', 'Nature, structure and development of criminology', 'Contemporary theories on crime and punishment' and 'Fundamental issues and challenges' facing criminological research in China.

As a scholarly discipline, criminology in China is growing in stature, maturity and utility. In the short thirty years since 1979, China has successfully established criminology as a scientific field of study with well-defined subjects, recognised scholars and copious research/publications. A cursory review of pertinent literature in law, criminology and China studies shows that to date, there are very few systematic and comprehensive studies of criminology (in English language) as an emerging and important field of academic discipline in China. As a result, we know very little about its focus and scope; direction and trend; theories and findings; and problems and issues. This is a first attempt to do so. The article (in two parts, published separately) investigates into: 'Literature on law, crime and punishment in China'; 'The idea of crime (Fanzui)'; 'Traditional thinking of crime and punishment in imperial China'; 'Nature and structure of criminology as a discipline'; 'Contemporary development of criminology in China'; 'Contemporary theories on crime and punishment' and 'Fundamental issues and challenges' facing criminological research in China.

This Article is a first attempt to study cyberspace governance and computer crime control in Hong Kong. It begins with a discussion of how computer crime was "discovered" as a cognizable object of control. Next, it explores the nature, prevalence and distribution of computer crime in Hong Kong before embarking on a comprehensive review and critical analysis of the Hong Kong government's cyberspace governance philosophy and computer crime control policy. The Article closes with a number of recommendations for improving Hong Kong cyberspace governance, which focus on developing a broad, overarching policy that both meets the public's goals and addresses private sector concerns.

In January 29th 1999 the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) delivered the long-awaited and controversial judgement in the cases of Ng Ka-ling and Ng Tan-tan (infants suing by their father and next friend Ng Sek-ning) vs. the director of immigration; Tsui Kuen-nang vs. the director of immigration; the director of immigration vs. Cheung Lai-wah (an infant suing by her father and next friend Cheung Min-Cheung). These cases have to be known collectively as the "right of abode" case or decision. The author discusses the legal context, unsurmountable differences between the PRC and HKSAR (Hongkong Special Administrative Region), among other topics. (DÜI-Sen)

According to the author, October 20th 1998 was an eventful day for Hong Kong. It was the day Cheung Tse-Keung, also known as the "Big Spender" (or dafushao), and 35 other alleged accomplices went on trial in China for a host of criminal charges, ranging from murder to kidnapping to smuggling of explosives, committed in Hong Kong and China from 1991 to 1997. He discusses why it is necessary to study the "Big Spender" case, legal proceedings and legal analysis of this case, implications for Hongkong's Basic Law, among other issues. (DÜI-Sen)